Writing Amitava on 03 Feb 2010 05:14 pm
The Right Words
(City of Words by Vito Acconci, 1999)
Here is a little excerpt from an interview in The Hindu, where I answer the questions asked by Ziya Us Salam:
I read somewhere that the biggest challenge for you is the task of putting words to page! Isn’t that surprising for somebody whose level of engagement with his craft is worthy of emulation?
You are very kind, but I have to say: it is very difficult to find and then put down words in the right order. Not just the words that describe the people coming out of a train at a crowded station, but the struggle of the self that attempts to place its own ambitions among them. The struggle for the right words is also, then, in a serious sense, the search for an attitude.
Also, the reviews of my book have begun to appear in the Indian press. The Times of India calls the book “a must-read.” The reviewer in OPEN magazine has a few reservations but also calls it “a must-read” and adds that the book “reminds one of the writings of that great chronicler of war, Ryszard Kapuscinski.” Best of all is this dismissal from the Indian Express where the reviewer hasn’t bothered to read more than the first few pages–I don’t simply mean that all his examples and quotes are from the Prologue or the Introduction, although that too is true, but that each claim of his is contradicted by what appears in the rest of my book.
P.S. At the Jaipur Literature Festival, I was involved in several conversations about reviewing. A lot of the discussion focused on malice but I think some plain statements can be made about sheer incompetence and bad faith. For example, the Indian Express reviewer of my book departs from his practice of sticking to the first 20-30 pages and actually cites at the end something from my conclusion. He mentions my claim that the war on terror screens from our view the real crime. This happens to be the last line of the book. His charge is that I don’t disclose what the real crime is. What a bummer! Especially if you only read the last line and nothing else in that chapter. Every line that precedes that line in that section is a description of the war in Iraq, which, I argue, is being kept hidden from us because our newspapers are busy presenting to us the break-up of yet another terror cell in this country.
Nilanjana S. Roy joins the debate here with a report on the state of criticism.









on 04 Feb 2010 at 8:31 am # Abdullah Khan
REVIEWER IN INDIAN EXPRESS: But whether he’s talking of men picked up by Mumbai cops after the 1993 bomb blasts, or S.A.R. Geelani, or Muslims in post-9/11 America who were befriended by FBI informants, there’s a startling absence of the other side. Geelani tells the author in vivid detail what happened to him. But no cop, no public prosecutor appears to tell his/her story. Why Kumar didn’t try to seek out the other side is a mystery to this reviewer.
MY REPLY: Dear reviwer, We had had enough of the other side of stories in form of breaking news and ad nauseam attempts by the media to declare the suspects as culprits. In fact, Prof. Kumar has tried to tell the stories from the victims’ point of view because these stories were untold. I am also startled why have you put inverted commas around VICTIMS. Are you still not convinced of their innocence? But sir, this time the court has acquitted them.
on 05 Feb 2010 at 5:54 am # Rahul Pandita
ha ha ha! Nice one, Mr. Khan
on 06 Feb 2010 at 3:27 am # Ruchi
Haha…v well said. I am looking forward to reading it
on 06 Feb 2010 at 6:55 pm # abdullah
Rahul Bhai! Thanks!